The Fantasy Basketball Encyclopedia

Operations

2026-27 fantasy basketball evidence and confidence policy

The encyclopedia separates observed facts, attributed forecasts, community leads, and its own projections so that a fresh rumor never masquerades as a settled role.

Up: 2026-27 Fantasy Basketball Encyclopedia

Related: Using projection disagreement in fantasy basketball · Fantasy basketball decision calibration · How NBA injury reports should change fantasy decisions

Evidence ladder

Grade Evidence Appropriate use
A NBA/team transactions, rosters, injury reports, schedules, contracts, coach/player remarks, and official statistics Identity, status, dates, observed performance, and direct statements
B Stable statistical databases and transaction/depth-chart services with visible update dates Cross-checks, historical rates, eligibility, and provisional roster structure
C Specialist projections, rankings, podcasts, videos, and reported analysis with a named author and date Attributed expectations, alternative assumptions, and expert disagreement
D Identified social posts and substantive community analysis Leads, hypotheses, market sentiment, and overlooked mechanisms
E Unsourced screenshots, anonymous claims, copied aggregation, or pages whose season/update date cannot be established Discovery only; never a factual foundation

An official source can still be incomplete: a roster page does not declare a rotation, and a coach's July remark is not a binding minute allocation. Conversely, a careful specialist can make a strong forecast without becoming the source of record for a transaction. Evidence grade describes what a source can establish, not the prestige of its logo.

Four separate confidence labels

Every material player projection should distinguish:

The overall label is the weakest high-leverage component, not an average that hides a fatal uncertainty. A stable star with unresolved surgery timing can have high rate confidence and low availability confidence. A healthy rookie can have high roster confidence and low minutes and rate confidence.

Freshness states

The access date and the source's own publication/update date are both recorded when available. A dynamically rendered page can change without preserving a public archive, so the encyclopedia records what was visible at extraction time.

Social, Reddit, and video rules

A social post or Reddit comment is attributed to its author or handle and labelled as analysis, sentiment, or an unverified claim. Engagement is not evidence of accuracy. A useful post supplies a mechanism that can be checked: a roster opening, coach quote, lineup pattern, injury update, or statistical comparison.

Videos and podcasts are indexed at the episode level. The note records title, creator, publication date, URL, relevant timestamps when recoverable, format assumptions, players discussed, and the episode's principal claims. A transcript summary is a paraphrase unless a short quotation is necessary and verified.

Projection versus rank

A projection estimates an outcome such as games, minutes, or a stat line. A ranking transforms projections through a declared format, population, and horizon. An ADP describes acquisition behavior. A take is an analyst's judgment. These fields are never substituted for one another.

Published ranks are retained with their native format. Cross-source comparisons follow Using projection disagreement in fantasy basketball: normalize dates, games, minutes, scoring rules, population, and per-game versus total value before interpreting disagreement.

Correction policy

Corrections preserve the earlier claim when it matters for understanding changing market belief, then add a dated correction. Silent replacement is reserved for spelling, broken links, and mechanical errors. A player changing teams requires updates to the player dossier, old and new team depth charts, the roster ledger, minute totals, and any affected rankings—not merely one line.

Open questions